|
Press Release - November 21, 2007
Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Michelle Turner
michelle.turner@mcpscurriculum.org
(301) 335-6042
GENDER IDENTITY ACT OPENS FEMALE FACILITIES TO MEN
Montgomery County, MD – “By the stroke of a very powerful pen, County Executive
Leggett has broken the biological barriers that separate male and female facilities. No
longer will women and girls be able to feel safe in the most private and personal facilities
in schools, public pools, malls, stores, health clubs, restaurants and other public places
throughout the county,” according to Michelle Turner, spokeswoman for Citizens for a
Responsible Curriculum.
CRC, a grassroots organization of Montgomery County citizens, has been in the forefront
of the fight to get restrooms, showers, changing rooms and other private facilities
exempted from the county’s new gender identity act.
The act, passed by the Montgomery Council on November 13 and signed by County
Executive Ike Leggett, prohibits discrimination in housing, employment, public
accommodations, and cable and taxicab services based on a person’s self-described
gender identity, which may deviate from his or her biological sex. The act adds gender
identity to the list of protected classes to Chapter 27 of the Montgomery County Code
banning discrimination.
Critics of the act focused on an amendment to its public accommodation provision which
would have expressly ended sex-segregated facilities, opening ladies room doors to men
who feel female. When the council removed the amendment, the broadly written public
accommodations provision left the use of private facilities by transgenders to be
interpreted by the county’s Human Rights Commission.
The commission has already gone on record as stating it “would interpret the bill as
allowing a person to use facilities based on that person's gender identity.”
[Bill 23-07, bottom of page 3].
Under the act, “Any biological male who is willing to wear a dress and who is feeling
transgendered that particular moment can enter the ladies room or locker room. What
about the convicted pedophile? No exception for him. What about the convicted rapist?
No exception there. What about the child pornographer? Was any exemption made to
keep people on the registered sex crimes list from using the rights set forth in the
accommodation section of the bill? No,” said Turner.
Another focus of CRC’s criticism is the act’s lack of an exemption for religious
organizations such as churches, schools and religious book stores which are covered
employers under the act. They can no longer restrict hiring to those who hold similar
religious beliefs. “The act will use the force of law to make these organizations accept
transgenders, transvestites, and cross dressers as employees. Will Christian employees
who have a Bible on their desk be judged guilty of a hate crime by the HRC under this
act?” said Turner.
The Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which was recently passed by the
House of Representatives, added protection for homosexuals but did not have the votes to
add gender identity. It also includes an outright exemption for religious organizations
and schools.
Opponents of the act say they will seek a referendum and plan to start gathering
signatures soon. Their new website www.notmyshower.com provides information on the
push.
|